You write with sincerity—and I want to honor that. But sincerity is not the same as truth. What you’ve offered here is beautiful in tone, but it carries a theology that cannot bear the weight of the Cross. It feels like peace, but what it quietly removes is the Person who alone brings peace.
You claim truth is beyond words. But the Word became flesh. You say Yeshua is the Logos—but then you place Him alongside Om, Tao, and Brahman, as though His wounds were interchangeable with symbols. You say all names point to the same God. But Christ named Himself—and He named sin. He didn’t dissolve the ego. He carried it to death.
You say we must clean the house to reveal the light already within. But the Gospel I know doesn’t teach that we uncover salvation. It teaches that we receive it, because Someone died to give it.
So I offer this not as a correction, but as a plea: that you may one day meet the Christ who is not felt into being, but revealed in blood and mercy. Not an archetype. Not a cosmic current. But the crucified and risen Son of God.
Not for integration. But for redemption.
If you ever want to talk more—about why I believe this, or what I’ve come to carry—I’m here. Not to argue. But to witness.
Thank you for your heartfelt response. I truly appreciate your sincerity.
I understand why you hold the position you do. I know how central the Cross is to your faith. And I want to be clear: I have deep reverence for Yeshua’s life, His mission, His suffering.
When I say that truth is beyond words, I’m not dismissing the logos made flesh in Yeshua.
Rather, I’m saying that words—doctrines, labels, and systems—can never fully contain or define the Divine. Yeshua came to reveal the very nature of God: selfless love, mercy, and the death of ego.
Yes, Yeshua is the Son of God. And yet, I know we are all sons and daughters of God, made in His image. Yeshua’s story is unique—His mission, His life, His path—but I also believe He is not the only one who has come with this mission.
Throughout history, God has spoken through many voices, in many times, in many cultures, always calling us back to love, to truth, and to the Source of all.
When I mention Om, Tao, Brahman, and Logos,
I’m saying there is only one God, and all peoples and nations, through generations, have sensed this same Source—though they may call it by different names. These names, traditions, and symbols arise from the same Divine Reality. They are not in competition; they are echoes, each culture’s unique way of describing the God who is beyond all language.
You write with sincerity—and I want to honor that. But sincerity is not the same as truth. What you’ve offered here is beautiful in tone, but it carries a theology that cannot bear the weight of the Cross. It feels like peace, but what it quietly removes is the Person who alone brings peace.
You claim truth is beyond words. But the Word became flesh. You say Yeshua is the Logos—but then you place Him alongside Om, Tao, and Brahman, as though His wounds were interchangeable with symbols. You say all names point to the same God. But Christ named Himself—and He named sin. He didn’t dissolve the ego. He carried it to death.
You say we must clean the house to reveal the light already within. But the Gospel I know doesn’t teach that we uncover salvation. It teaches that we receive it, because Someone died to give it.
So I offer this not as a correction, but as a plea: that you may one day meet the Christ who is not felt into being, but revealed in blood and mercy. Not an archetype. Not a cosmic current. But the crucified and risen Son of God.
Not for integration. But for redemption.
If you ever want to talk more—about why I believe this, or what I’ve come to carry—I’m here. Not to argue. But to witness.
Because not all presence is communion.
And not all peace leads home.
But Christ does.
Daniel,
Thank you for your heartfelt response. I truly appreciate your sincerity.
I understand why you hold the position you do. I know how central the Cross is to your faith. And I want to be clear: I have deep reverence for Yeshua’s life, His mission, His suffering.
When I say that truth is beyond words, I’m not dismissing the logos made flesh in Yeshua.
Rather, I’m saying that words—doctrines, labels, and systems—can never fully contain or define the Divine. Yeshua came to reveal the very nature of God: selfless love, mercy, and the death of ego.
Yes, Yeshua is the Son of God. And yet, I know we are all sons and daughters of God, made in His image. Yeshua’s story is unique—His mission, His life, His path—but I also believe He is not the only one who has come with this mission.
Throughout history, God has spoken through many voices, in many times, in many cultures, always calling us back to love, to truth, and to the Source of all.
When I mention Om, Tao, Brahman, and Logos,
I’m saying there is only one God, and all peoples and nations, through generations, have sensed this same Source—though they may call it by different names. These names, traditions, and symbols arise from the same Divine Reality. They are not in competition; they are echoes, each culture’s unique way of describing the God who is beyond all language.